Is the Puff Bar Targeted at Reducing the Addiction Potential of ELECTRIC CIGARETTES?
Puff Bar is a wonderful alternative to a traditional ice cream treat since it has none of the cons connected with an ice cream treat. Puff Bar is a simple sweet treat, which makes it a great alternative to traditional ice cream treats. Puff Bar is manufactured with only natural flavors, so it’s a healthy alternative for individuals who are watching their diet. In addition to that, Puff Bar is easy to make, you can make it as often as you want and never have to prepare the ice cream each and every time. It’s ideal for kids and for parties because it’s easy to serve.
Puff Bar is a relatively new product, that was developed to test people a reaction to herbal cigarette alternatives. Whenever we smoke we are exposing ourselves to thousands of chemicals, some are good, some are bad. Puff Bar does not contain any artificial flavors, colors or nicotine and also has zero calories. The manufacturers declare that Puff Bar doesn’t really taste like cigarettes since it is made from completely 100 % natural ingredients including fruits, sugar and mint.
One of the biggest issues in public areas health today is obesity and diet. Due to this many companies are developing products that help people stay trim. The Puff Bar is one of these products, they are currently marketing them under names like Puff Nosh, Pop Tart and Popcorn Squeeze. The makers of Puff Bar claim that individuals who use their product to lose excess weight can easily do so if they only need to carry around the tiny product. The makers of Puff Bar are aware that since public health officials have been calling to find out more on the dangers of empty e-cigarette cartridges it’s pretty clear that the general public wants to know more about Puff Bar and whether or not it poses a risk to public health.
By calling their product a “reusable” cartridge they’re in direct violation of the U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA). According to the FDA any e-cigarette that contains nicotine must contain an insert that allows you to put it into the mouth area, this means that you can’t put it into your pocket or purse to go on it where ever you might go. If the product also offers an extinguisher additionally it is in violation of the law. The reason being that since there is no ash produced by a puff Bar e Cigarette it isn’t a valid device to use to refill a preexisting e cigarette with nicotine or to smoke a different one.
Since the maker of Puff Bar realized this their lawyers have sent letters to the firms that produce puff bars claiming they have marketed their product in a manner that is illegal. As well as sending cease and desist orders from the lawyers have demanded that the manufacturers cease and desist distribution of Puff Bar of Cigarettes and refund customers money. The letters request they no longer make reference to their product as a “smoke machine”. Instead the company’s lawyers have suggested they call it a “tobacco alternative”.
What the legal team did isn’t entirely surprising. The issue with Puff Bar is that its e Cigarette product is itself a loophole in the law. This is because there’s currently no law mandating that electronic cigarettes have to include warning labels or advertising. The inclusion of a “smoking alternative” could start a flood of lawsuits that would be filed by municipalities that wished to Eightvape Coupon charge cigarette companies for introducing another polluting form of tobacco into the marketplace.
In addition to the possibility of case being filed by municipalities the inclusion of flavored e cigarettes on the market could result in a reduction in the sale of tobacco by non-smokers. Research shows that smokers who are offered non-tobacco flavored e-cigs will replace those cigarettes with the ones that contain nicotine. By making tobacco less accessible to young people and to younger generations, this could substantially reduce the number of people who die from tobacco related illnesses. Also it seems that the addition of the puff bar to a number of tobacco-flavored electronic cigarettes could lead smokers to seek out “real” cigarettes rather than rely so heavily on an alternative that may not supply them with nicotine.
It appears that the UK government may have a point. There is currently no requirement for tobacco companies to add warning labels on their products nor is there a ban on flavoured tobacco or e-liquid. The only thing that these products all have as a common factor is that they will not cause cancer or other diseases. It appears to be a question of economics that’s being overlooked. A solution just like the puff bar would seem like a much better way to make money for tobacco companies because they’re essentially creating products that are more difficult to consume, which means that fewer people will purchase them.